Forget Mars, Why Not Colonize Venus Instead?

Elon Musk has announced plans to colonize Mars in the near future and NASA is planning a manned mission to the red planet in the 2030’s, but for some reason we aren’t talking about Venus.

The second planet in our solar system, Venus, is much closer than Mars, has Earthlike gravity, and a heavier atmosphere could offer better protection to interplanetary settlers than the red planet.

It’s so similar to our planet it’s been nicknamed “Earth’s twin next door,” so why isn’t anyone talking about colonizing Venus, sometimes lovingly referred to as the Evening Star. Gabe Perez-Giz and the people over at PBS’s popular web series SpaceTime say it all has to do with something they call Surfacism.

“Ever since the days of seafaring exploration we’ve had an obsession with landing on the surface of things. If you don’t plant a flag on something it’s almost like having gotten there doesn’t count.”

Venus is 8.7 million miles closer to our planet than Mars meaning a spaceflight from Earth would be 30 to 50 percent shorter, which is why we sent probes to Venus long before we sent them to the red planet.

It also means a manned mission to the second planet in the solar system would require significantly less fuel, food, and supplies for astronauts and potential settlers, which would translate into a cheaper trip. That has real meaning if mankind ever intends to establish offworld colonies and become a two planet species.

The thick atmosphere on Venus would protect astronauts better than the thin layer of protection offered by the red planet and the presence of carbon dioxide means colonists could potentially produce their own oxygen.

image: http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/NASA-HAVOC-Habitat-670×284.png

Floating airships would allow astronauts to live on Venus. Image via NASA

HAVOC environment [Image via NASA]

The planet’s heavier gravity, much more like that of Earth than Mars could ever be, would be easier on the bodies of space explorers and prevent the bone loss present in astronauts who spend a lot of time in space.

Power is also an issue since Venus is much closer to the sun than Mars, solar panels would produce much more energy than those on the red planet.

Why not Venus?

Popular culture is enchanted with the idea of colonizing Mars; the red planet has inspired a number of books and movies, which has prompted the spacefaring nations of the world to aim for the red planet instead of Venus.

Although Venus does have a solid surface like the Earth, humans can’t land there as the temperature hovers around 842 degrees Fahrenheit, a hot day by any measurement. The surface is also under intense pressure; any spacecraft that made planetfall would be crushed like an egg.

Some 30 miles above the surface, however, the temperature and pressure become much more like Earth than any other place in the solar system, so colonists could live in cloud cities like the one run by Lando Calrissian in Star Wars.

NASA has devised a Venus living environment. Image vis NASA/JPL-Caltech
Image vis NASA/JPL-Caltech

NASA in fact designed such a living environment, essentially a blimp city, and dubbed it the High Altitude Venus Operational Concept (HAVOC), NASA aerospace engineer Christopher A. Jones told CNN.

“One concept is a lighter-than-air vehicle that could carry either a host of instruments and probes, or a habitat and ascent vehicle for a crew of two astronauts to explore Venus for up to a month.”

The idea, so far just a concept, is that astronauts could live on the blimp city 30 miles above the surface of Venus for up to 30 days and eventually could evolve into a permanent human settlement.

The manned mission to Venus could be completed in less time than it would take to send astronauts to Mars, and it could serve as a stepping-stone to the red planet, Jones told CNN.

“Eventually, a short duration human mission would allow us to gain experience having humans live at another world, with the hope that it would someday be possible to live in the atmosphere permanently.”

The main problem with the concept is sending a spacecraft to Venus that isn’t designed to land on the planet’s surface.

Any spacecraft sent to the planet would need to slow itself with aerobraking maneuvers in time to for the blimp to deploy and be inflated so the airship would float above the ground instead of plummeting to the surface and being crushed like an egg, Jones told CNN.

“With advances in technology and further refinement of the concept, missions to the Venusian atmosphere can expand humanity’s future in space.”

Source: Inquisitor

1 comment

Featured Videos

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

1 Comment

Latest Posts

Top Authors

Most Commented

Around The Web